Global warming is all the rage nowadays. No trouble finding anything to scare the bejeebers out of you in both tabloid and news-with-context-sources. The polar bears are dying, disease ridden insects will flourish and the most important thing we can do is adhere to Kyoto.
Not really topics for an up-beat conversation, but if you read the book listed on the left of this blog (at the time of posting); Bjørn Lomborg’s excellent Cool It, you can be prepared for the next cocktail party to dis polar bears(1), ridicule the Kyoto Protocol(2) or make cunning remarks about why arguing that global warming causes malaria is about 1/60 000th of an argument(3) and should hence be replaced by a very small shell script of retorts. Now, just to make it clear: I have absolutely no doubt that our dear marble is heating up, and that humanity is to blame. But with the combination of ET-syndrome and shock-therapy with a holy grail to name-drop, chances are we’ll spend a lot of energy and money on doing the exactly wrong things, so again, read the book. (It’s good.)
However, we cannot always put our faith in quoting obscure facts about how hopeless it all is; if what we are doing is wrong and things only seem to get worse anyway, then where shall we direct our efforts (and rage)? Thankfully, MemeFlux has the answer.
Cows.
All this really started (as often does) with some wine-induced debate & Wikipedia here the other day, where our all favorite source of more-or-less-correct information could disclose two interesting facts:
- There are approximately 1.3 billion cows on the planet.
- Cattle contribute to around 18% of greenhouse gas emissions- due to their greedy 4 stomachs and methane-rich flatulence.
(also, the article continues to make the points that “Cattle are blamed for a host of other environmental crimes, from acid rain to the introduction of alien species, from producing deserts to creating dead zones in the oceans, from poisoning rivers and drinking water to destroying coral reefs.”)So, applying the “cowboy scientific method” (combining data dubious comparability to make a cheap point) and a favorite pedagogical method (small words and visual aids), we can show two charts:
A headcount of cows and humans to get a CowMan population of 8 billion:

We can draw conclusion #1 - cows represent about 16% of the total population of polluting bastards.
Visualising the second fact of environmental impact:

We can see that this 16% of the population actually harm the environment more than all the other stuff caused by by humans; your average cow pollutes more than the average human. So if you want to make a difference, going veggie is not enough; you know what to do… (average being a point here, if you live in the western world you should probably aim for - pardon the pun - more than one cow).
So, happy hunting, but beware Cows with Guns.
Hat tip to Kim
1) most populations are in fact increasing, the ones decreasing are in places where average temperature has gone down in the last years
2) postpones effects of global warming about 5 years
3) the money spent to save one life by preventing global warming and thus the spread of malaria mosquitoes would save 60 000 by regular prevention and disease control